coraline: (eyecon)

[personal profile] coraline 2014-06-15 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, i'm pretty sure the foundation to the left is where the house used to be.
i understand why you'd want to split the parcel! but it doesn't look like they've gained a lot more space? so why move THAT house over, rather than building two new ones, or building a new one where you've moved the old one to?

[identity profile] 42itous.livejournal.com 2014-06-15 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
The thing that puzzles me is that there isn't enough room now between house and garage to maneuver a car. Maybe they'll demolish the garage, since it has no historic significance.... and put parking under the house, like so many others in Arlington.
coraline: (eyecon)

[personal profile] coraline 2014-06-16 01:33 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah it's all a little baffling.

[identity profile] nurrynur.livejournal.com 2014-06-17 02:30 pm (UTC)(link)
There might be some arcane zoning regulation that says you can't have more than N buildings on a parcel of Z size? So 2 is okay but 3 would be right out.

But as to the why not just build a new house where the old house is now sitting, I dunno..

Maybe they're just redoing the foundation and then will move the house right back where it started.